Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jeremy Chardy vs Daniel Evans Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Chardy vs Evans analysis and find out who is favored!
Jeremy Chardy vs Daniel Evans Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Chardy 3 - 4 Evans
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Chardy has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Evans has won 51.63%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Chardy, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Evans has won 49.31%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 26.05% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Chardy has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Evans has saved 60.31% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Chardy has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 2), with Evans winning 35% (W/L 14/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Chardy has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 210/ 162), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 51% (W/L 152/ 146). Evans has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 164/ 98), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 46% (W/L 47/ 55).
- Player level: In the last year, Chardy has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 1), where as Evans has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 27.78% of matches (W/L 5/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 7 times before with Chardy winning 3 times and Evans being victorious 4 times. They have played 19 sets in total, with Chardy winning 9 and Evans winning 10. The last match between Chardy and Evans was at the Australian Open - Melbourne, 19-01-2023, Second, Hard with Daniel Evans getting the victory 6-4 6-4 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:55:4.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Chardy and Evans have played a deciding set 3 times, with Chardy winning 1 times and Evans 2 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 3 tiebreaks against each other with Chardy winning 2, and Evans 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Chardy has played against opponents with an average rank of 43.5 while Evans has played against players with an average rank of 150.7.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Chardy has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Evans has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Chardy has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Evans has converted 28.23% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
876
Rank
25
High
37
Age
R
Plays
3
Total4
1
Hard3
1
Clay1
0
Indoor0
1
Grass0
62
Rank
21
High
34
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
Form
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
54% (494-426)
Career Total W/L
60% (552-374)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
26% (5-14)
$5,487,593
Career Prize Money
$4,736,130
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jeremy Chardy | Daniel Evans |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 3 | 4 |
| Sets Won | 9 | 10 |
| Games Won | 85 | 94 |
| Aces (Total) | 52 | 52 |
| DFs (Total) | 21 | 14 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:55:4 | 1:55:4 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (390/580) | 67% (372/555) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 68% (265/390) | 69% (256/372) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 46% (87/190) | 56% (103/183) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 35% (18/52) | 46% (24/52) |
| Return Points W% | 35% (196/555) | 39% (228/580) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 40% (2/5) | 60% (3/5) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 33% (1/3) | 67% (2/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 80% (5/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 20% (5/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (5/1) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 6-1 |
Stats 
Daniel Evans
Player
Jeremy Chardy
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve %
76%
(
62 of
82)
8
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
5
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
18 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
89
Total Points Won
64
|
||||
| 7-6(6) 6-7(7) 6-2 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Jeremy Chardy
75%
(
82 of
110)
1st Serve %
68%
(
84 of
124)
13
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
70%
(
57 of
82)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
55 of
84)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
34 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
49 of
124)
125
Total Points Won
109
|
||||
| 6-4 1-6 6-2 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Jeremy Chardy
64%
(
63 of
99)
1st Serve %
66%
(
60 of
91)
7
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
42 of
60)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
11%
(
2 of
18)
37%
(
37 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
91)
98
Total Points Won
92
|
||||
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Jeremy Chardy
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve %
49%
(
20 of
41)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
100%
(
21 of
21)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
5 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
25
|
||||
| 2-6 6-4 6-4 |
Stats
Jeremy Chardy
Player
Daniel Evans
62%
(
57 of
92)
1st Serve %
71%
(
63 of
89)
15
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
43 of
57)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
43 of
63)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
33 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
31 of
89)
90
Total Points Won
91
|
||||
| 6-4 7-6(3) |
Stats
Jeremy Chardy
Player
Daniel Evans
77%
(
53 of
69)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
11
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
44 of
53)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
32 of
39)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
18 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
18 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
62
|
||||
| 6-2 6-3 6-3 |
Stats
Jeremy Chardy
Player
Daniel Evans
67%
(
54 of
81)
1st Serve %
69%
(
60 of
87)
11
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
5
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
63%
(
10 of
16)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
43%
(
35 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
53 of
87)
99
Total Points Won
69
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jeremy Chardy | Daniel Evans |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 26% (5/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 35% (17/31) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 46% (219/259) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 30% (3/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 22% (2/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.26 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 62 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.29 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 67 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 2:12:58 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 186.58 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 56% (860/1536) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 71% (607/860) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 52% (349/676) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 28% (35/124) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 35% (540/1555) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 20% (1/4) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 22% (2/7) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 29% (5/17) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 10% (1/10) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 14% (1/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 57% (7/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 43% (7/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 8% (12/1) |
Jeremy Chardy Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Carlos Alcaraz
Player
Jeremy Chardy
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve %
65%
(
61 of
94)
10
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
10
84%
(
38 of
45)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
25%
(
18 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
49 of
94)
104
Total Points Won
63
|
6-0 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Jeremy Chardy
55%
(
33 of
60)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
64)
7
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
25 of
31)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
16 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lorenzo Sonego
Player
Jeremy Chardy
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
7
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hugo Gaston
Player
Jeremy Chardy
51%
(
25 of
49)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Jeremy Chardy
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve %
76%
(
62 of
82)
8
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
5
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
18 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
89
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jeremy Chardy
Player
Daniel Elahi Galan
61%
(
96 of
157)
1st Serve %
60%
(
73 of
122)
7
Aces
2
14
Double Faults
4
68%
(
65 of
96)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
45 of
73)
43%
(
26 of
61)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
19%
(
5 of
26)
42%
(
66 of
157)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
55 of
122)
146
Total Points Won
133
|
1-6 7-5 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Berrettini
Player
Jeremy Chardy
67%
(
67 of
100)
1st Serve %
64%
(
77 of
120)
17
Aces
12
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
54 of
67)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
55 of
77)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
23%
(
23 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
41 of
120)
118
Total Points Won
102
|
7-6(5) 7-6(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Jeremy Chardy
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
6
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
6
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexander Zverev
Player
Jeremy Chardy
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve %
68%
(
42 of
62)
11
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
89%
(
8 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
5 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Jeremy Chardy
Player
Liam Broady
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve %
70%
(
76 of
108)
11
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
2
82%
(
40 of
49)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
46 of
76)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
27%
(
21 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
106)
105
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(3) 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Daniel Evans Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Daniel Evans
59%
(
57 of
96)
1st Serve %
49%
(
49 of
101)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
75%
(
43 of
57)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
31 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
101)
105
Total Points Won
92
|
6-4 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Daniel Evans
66%
(
61 of
93)
1st Serve %
53%
(
60 of
114)
20
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
48 of
61)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
42 of
60)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
31%
(
29 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
43 of
114)
107
Total Points Won
100
|
6-3 4-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juncheng Shang
Player
Daniel Evans
68%
(
69 of
101)
1st Serve %
63%
(
49 of
78)
2
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
3
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
37 of
49)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
37%
(
37 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
78)
95
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Harold Mayot
49%
(
33 of
67)
1st Serve %
67%
(
51 of
76)
3
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
68%
(
23 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
17 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Hugo Grenier
56%
(
36 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fabio Fognini
Player
Daniel Evans
56%
(
49 of
88)
1st Serve %
56%
(
54 of
97)
3
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
5
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
41%
(
16 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
41%
(
36 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
44 of
97)
96
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Daniel Evans
49%
(
33 of
68)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
92)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
86
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Ofner
Player
Daniel Evans
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
67%
(
29 of
43)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
16 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Roberto Carballes Baena
Player
Daniel Evans
69%
(
57 of
83)
1st Serve %
59%
(
46 of
78)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
28 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Christopher Eubanks
Player
Daniel Evans
71%
(
78 of
110)
1st Serve %
66%
(
63 of
95)
21
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
58 of
78)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
53 of
63)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
0%
(
0 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
35 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
21%
(
20 of
95)
95
Total Points Won
110
|
7-6(3) 3-6 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
view more
Chardy Vs Evans Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
